Same problem with scanning, dense base and very difficult to expose the shadows. the base was too dense, not helped by having to underexpose the film to not blow out the colour and highlights (sound familiar). Lif e was too short and I moved to Ektachrome. I have many Kodachrome slides and used to print Cibachrome colour prints. ![]() gcĪgree totally! Kodachrome is a very difficult film to print from and to scan, but lovely to project. There would be a variance with every person who handles the film, including the shooter. The last of the high speed printers did that anyway because all the film was from different mfrs. I imagine that no two IT8 Film targets will be identical enough for scanner calibration, if they are from different film batches and variation in processing.īased on the above statements, he might as well scan and calibrate each roll of film individually because the film targets would not the same either. There is another problem and that is the consistency of the film production as well as the development process. ![]() Using a different film target will only calibrate for that film. The target needs to be on the correct film stock so that the scanner can be calibrated for that film, as all film emulsions are different just like camera sensors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |